ext_3306 ([identity profile] davesangel.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] strange_complex 2006-07-10 11:00 pm (UTC)

I totally agree - everyone slates Who for its cheesy effects and 'rubbery monsters'. And yes, perhaps there was an element of crappy monster in Caves, but as the story clearly demonstrates, Who doesn't need to rely on outstanding special effects or really convincing monsters (as a lot of people seem to think it does): all that is needed is great scriptwriting, plot and characterisation, which Caves has by the truckload.

And hooray for another Caves fan! :)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting