<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dw="https://www.dreamwidth.org">
  <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2017-04-16:3098856</id>
  <title>In this strange complex of time and space anything can happen</title>
  <subtitle>strange_complex</subtitle>
  <author>
    <name>strange_complex</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://strange-complex.dreamwidth.org/"/>
  <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://strange-complex.dreamwidth.org/data/atom"/>
  <updated>2020-11-07T21:02:08Z</updated>
  <dw:journal username="strange_complex" type="personal"/>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2017-04-16:3098856:668172</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://strange-complex.dreamwidth.org/668172.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://strange-complex.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=668172"/>
    <title>Hope</title>
    <published>2020-11-07T20:58:49Z</published>
    <updated>2020-11-07T21:02:08Z</updated>
    <category term="elections"/>
    <category term="the us of a"/>
    <category term="coronavirus"/>
    <category term="politics"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>13</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">Well, I am really, really happy for you tonight, America! It's just great to see people dancing in the streets for something which is actually good for once.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I must say I've never found Biden a hugely exciting candidate, and I was very worried for a long time that the Democratic campaign was relying too heavily on merely pitching him as 'not Trump', rather than offering enough that was positive and different. But I didn't follow the campaign at all closely. Maybe he offered more than I could see, or indeed maybe just not being Trump was enough this time? Certainly, Trump has set the bar for being better than him extremely low indeed. Just having a grown-up in charge who doesn't respond to a global pandemic by claiming it's a hoax, blaming it on the Chinese and suggesting people inject themselves with bleach will be a big positive change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As for Kamala Harris as VP, what an amazing historic first and a wonderful precedent for all women and girls, but especially those of colour.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I just hope that one way or another the transition of power happens smoothly, all Trump's legal challenges come to naught, and his supporters don't rise to the violence he's already been inciting them to.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, those of us elsewhere can hope that Biden might reverse the tide of isolationism which has seen American pull out of the Paris Climate Agreement, the WHO, UNESCO and heaven knows what else. And in Britain specifically we can cross fingers that Biden's obvious commitment to the Good Friday agreement will push our own horror-show political leaders towards a softer Brexit, and at the very least enjoy the sweet, sweet knowledge that N*gel F*rage lost £10,000 betting on Trump winning. Muahahahaha!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=strange_complex&amp;ditemid=668172" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:dreamwidth.org,2017-04-16:3098856:607852</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://strange-complex.dreamwidth.org/607852.html"/>
    <link rel="self" type="text/xml" href="https://strange-complex.dreamwidth.org/data/atom/?itemid=607852"/>
    <title>Electoral Services questionnaire</title>
    <published>2018-08-18T12:50:19Z</published>
    <updated>2018-08-18T12:56:01Z</updated>
    <category term="surveys"/>
    <category term="leeds"/>
    <category term="elections"/>
    <category term="pictures"/>
    <category term="electoral reform"/>
    <dw:security>public</dw:security>
    <dw:reply-count>4</dw:reply-count>
    <content type="html">Interesting. I've just reconfirmed my eligibility to vote in elections in Leeds, prompted by a letter about it which arrived yesterday. I did the actual confirmation online, and after I'd done so a text popped up asking me to fill in a survey on my experiences of the election process in Leeds. Naturally, being geekily interested in these things, I took the opportunity. Most of the questions were, as I expected, on fairly simple / basic things, such as how easy I find postal voting, how regularly I vote, and what experience (if any) I'd had with contacting our local Electoral Services Department. This one, though, really made the electoral reformer in me sit up and pay attention (click if it's too small to read, and you should get the original):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/strange_complex/1528180/654008/654008_original.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/strange_complex/1528180/654008/654008_600.jpg" alt="ERS election questionnaire.jpg" title="ERS election questionnaire.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'd already said in a previous answer that I always vote in all elections, so I couldn't say that any of those would make me more likely to vote, but I hardly wanted to anyway. What a dreadful set of options! Thankfully, they offered a box underneath so that I could explain my answers:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;a target="_blank" href="https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/strange_complex/1528180/653634/653634_original.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/strange_complex/1528180/653634/653634_600.jpg" alt="ERS election questionnaire answers.jpg" title="ERS election questionnaire answers.jpg"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The people administering this questionnaire are &lt;a href="https://www.electoralreform.co.uk/"&gt;Electoral Reform Services&lt;/a&gt;, whose business is precisely this - to provide the voting apparatus for surveys and elections. They happen to be partially-owned by the &lt;a href="https://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/"&gt;Electoral Reform Society&lt;/a&gt;, who know all about STV as their primary purpose is to campaign for it, and indeed share my concerns with online voting and voter ID too - but they won't have had any input into the questions for this. Rather, the questions seem to have come from the &lt;a href="https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/"&gt;Electoral Commission&lt;/a&gt;, who are responsible for running and ensuring the fair conduct of public elections in this county, and have here employed Electoral Reform Services to conduct the survey. Since some of the questions referenced types of elections which don't apply in Leeds (e.g. mayoral contests), I assume the same survey is being offered to people confirming their electoral eligibility online all over the country.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Given all that, it worries me a lot to see these questions, as it suggests a very real risk of the methods listed being introduced (or extended, in the case of voter ID which has &lt;a href="http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/the-results-of-the-2018-voter-id-pilots/"&gt;already been piloted to poor effect&lt;/a&gt;) in this country. And yet still no prospect of any actual improvements to our electoral system, such as STV. :-( I only hope they get a lot of responses along the same lines as mine, basically saying "All these ideas are rubbish - STV NOW!"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If you share my concerns and get the chance to fill in this questionnaire yourself, please feel very free to use my answers as inspiration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.dreamwidth.org/tools/commentcount?user=strange_complex&amp;ditemid=607852" width="30" height="12" alt="comment count unavailable" style="vertical-align: middle;"/&gt; comments</content>
  </entry>
</feed>
