![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I really need to buy a printer. Quite urgently, actually. Please convey your printer-related advice to me via the poll below:
[Poll #757065]
I am also interested in views on the relative merits of straightforward inkjets, straightforward laser printers and 'all-in-ones' which copy and scan as well as printing. Do comment if you have thoughts on any of them!

[Poll #757065]
I am also interested in views on the relative merits of straightforward inkjets, straightforward laser printers and 'all-in-ones' which copy and scan as well as printing. Do comment if you have thoughts on any of them!

no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:26 (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:34 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:36 (UTC)If using it for photos it's worth looking at the relative merits of these printers vs. traditional prints, as there's a bit of a backlash against inkjet photo printers what with ink cost and fading.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:40 (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:43 (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 13:48 (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 14:15 (UTC)Samsung lasers are very cheap but the supplied toner is only half-filled - they make the money back when you need to replace the toner cartridge.
I'd only go for inkjet if I wanted colour or A3, otherwise laser is best (and less hassle).
Avoid combination devices, as it's just more to go wrong, and more expensive to replace when it does. Drivers can be an issue to.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 15:31 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 15:44 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 16:30 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 17:31 (UTC)No real gripes from me about any of the manufacturers listed, but I'd prefer to pick one where I know there will be no difficulty in getting cartridges (whether original, "compatible" or "recycled"). It's not much help if they aren't stocked in Tescos or PC World if you're in a hurry.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 18:29 (UTC)I'm not hugely impressed with it to be honest. It makes a right song and dance about doing anything and the scanning software it came with is crap. Also, although all the ink colours are in separate cartridges, it will sometimes refuse to print something black and white because the yellow is empty, or some other excuse. And the ink is fiendishly expensive.
I end up emailing stuff to myself at work to print instead of using my printer at home. It's not that is doesn't do what I want, it just makes it difficult!
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 27 June 2006 23:36 (UTC)g'luck
*daha*
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2006 15:35 (UTC)I'm not that up on the merits of individual manufacturers, so I can't comment much on them other than we use a fair amount of HP kit here (printers and other stuff), and they're usually pretty good. I'd avoid Compaq or Dell cos I'd suspect them of being cheap rebage jobs for the home market.
Having said that- lots of people get free printers they don't want with new PCs and dump them straight on e-bay- you could pick one of those up for a few quid and even if it only lasts 6 months you've got your money's worth.
If you don't fancy that and want to buy one, my thoughts would be that an inkjet'd be cheaper and'd do colour should you need it, but one with a seperate black cartridge'd be a good idea because you'll be bound to burn through that faster- it might not last longer than a couple of years though. On the other hand, a decent b&w laserjet could keep going quite happily for lots longer.
Re- all in ones: The extra facilities could be handy sometimes, depending on how much you might use them, but as with all these things more complication = more stuff to go wrong...
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: