A Scanner Darkly
Wednesday, 13 September 2006 23:13I've just been out to see the above with
nigelmouse, at a fabulous cinema called the Hyde Park. Leeds City Council inform me that it was originally built as a hotel in 1908, but became a cinema in 1914, and has been one ever since. It's a real treasure, and I could quite understand why
nigelmouse said he often goes there as much for the cinema as for the films.
The film was very much worth it in itself this time, though. It uses a new animation technique, which involved filming the action with live actors, and then tracing over some, but not all, of the frames with animation, and using a kind of 3D equivalent of tweening to fill in the rest. The effect was really quite trippy - movements were realistic enough to make you expect full realism, but still unnervingly not-quite-real, while in some shots it was entirely clear that you were watching an animation, and in others (especially long shots), the line between animation and live action became very thin.
And all of this fitted in very well with the subject-matter of the film - a world of drugs paranoia and double-identities. Much of the story, in fact, is seen through the eyes of a character who is suffering increasingly impaired mental faculties through drug-use, and is hallucinating and confused. Whilst the viewer is allowed to work out what's actually going on by the end of the film, for much of it we're as confused about the nature of reality as he is, and the animation style adds a lot to that.
Definitely worth seeing once: probably even better a second time when you can benefit from being clearer about what's going on than the main character is.

The film was very much worth it in itself this time, though. It uses a new animation technique, which involved filming the action with live actors, and then tracing over some, but not all, of the frames with animation, and using a kind of 3D equivalent of tweening to fill in the rest. The effect was really quite trippy - movements were realistic enough to make you expect full realism, but still unnervingly not-quite-real, while in some shots it was entirely clear that you were watching an animation, and in others (especially long shots), the line between animation and live action became very thin.
And all of this fitted in very well with the subject-matter of the film - a world of drugs paranoia and double-identities. Much of the story, in fact, is seen through the eyes of a character who is suffering increasingly impaired mental faculties through drug-use, and is hallucinating and confused. Whilst the viewer is allowed to work out what's actually going on by the end of the film, for much of it we're as confused about the nature of reality as he is, and the animation style adds a lot to that.
Definitely worth seeing once: probably even better a second time when you can benefit from being clearer about what's going on than the main character is.
Leeds International Film Festival
Date: Wednesday, 13 September 2006 22:40 (UTC)The Hyde Park is still officially my favorite cinema of all time.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 13 September 2006 23:19 (UTC)Rotoscoping itself is not that new as a technique. A favourite computer game of mine "The Last Express" used it but it's been used since the 30s and famously in the 1970s Lord of the Rings.
Glad it was an enjoyable film though -- doubtless I will catch it when it comes out on DVD. Rotoscoping is pretty appropriate for Phillip Dick's obsessions with the blurring and nature of identity.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 07:08 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 08:18 (UTC)Um. You know we'd pencilled in lunch today? My to-do list has reached simply terrifying proportions - can we do next week instead? Really sorry about this.
email me: dakegra (at) yahoo co uk
no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 08:32 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 08:37 (UTC)3D tweening is still tweening, btw- it's used a lot in games to move things around when you don't have a specific animation to do it.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 09:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 09:53 (UTC):-)
happy to hear they've sorted the seats out. They were quaint in their way, but sore on the bum.
Re: Leeds International Film Festival
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 10:16 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 10:18 (UTC)Was The Wicker Man as bad as I'm assuming?
no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 10:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 10:21 (UTC)The seats haven't gone far, I've heard they're now at the commonplace (http://www.thecommonplace.org.uk/), used for thier own cinema room.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 10:22 (UTC)I thought they did a pretty good job with Wicker Man really but then I don't hold the original especially sacred. What they did well was to keep some measure of tension in a film where you know what will happen from the start.
no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 10:23 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 10:23 (UTC)Glad to see they're being put to good use too. Recycle!
no subject
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2006 11:28 (UTC)When I've finished the book I'm reading now, I'll have another look at it I think. Maybe I just had Dick-overload (no innuendos please), having just read 'The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch' and 'Martian Time-Slip' just before. I did like 'Martian Time-Slip' though, but it ended a bit abruptly.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 17 September 2006 09:54 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 17 September 2006 11:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 17 September 2006 11:51 (UTC)