Sunday, 4 December 2011

strange_complex: (Miss Pettigrew)
I saw this a few weeks ago at the Cottage Road cinema with [livejournal.com profile] ms_siobhan and [livejournal.com profile] planet_andy. As usual, the evening began with a selection of vintage adverts and a short Pathé news-reel feature - this time dedicated to 'The Fascinating Art of the Yo-Yo', and including a demonstration from Art Pickles, 1954 World Yo-Yo Champion! Art could apparently strike a match using a yo-yo, and also operate two of them at once.

The film itself was a bit of an odd one. It stars James Stewart, of It's a Wonderful Life fame, and shares with the earlier film both an interest in celebrating the virtues of wholesome small-town family life, and an element of magical realism. Stewart's character this time is Elwood P. Dowd - a nice but eccentric fellow in his mid-forties, who embarrasses his sister and niece by behaving as though he has a giant invisible rabbit named Harvey as a friend. On one level, the narrative arc of the story is sweet and optimistic. Gradually, we are given to understand that Harvey is real, and is a manifestation of a benevolent fairy creature known as a Pooka who has been looking after Harvey for some years. We as the audience never see him, but other apparently sane characters do - although usually at moments when they are stressed or anxious themselves. Meanwhile, Elwood wins everyone over by being kind and charming and generous, and they all learn to love him and to live with his little eccentricity after all.

The film seemed to conceive itself, then, as a parable about accepting people's foibles, and becoming better and happier for it. But (again rather as with It's a Wonderful Life), I found I felt uncomfortable about swallowing it wholesale. This time, I think the main barrier was actually the suggestion that Harvey was real all along. It's not that I usually mind magical realism per se - in fact, like most fantastical story devices, I generally love it. But in this particular case the problem was that it got in the way of the metaphor about acceptance. For the other characters, discovering that Harvey was real was a major step towards their acceptance of Elwood - but that also meant that they didn't so much learn to understand his strangeness, as to recategorise him as 'normal' after all. Meanwhile, it was all too clear that had they not done so, Elwood would have been committed to a sanatorium, subjected to hydrotherapy and injected with a serum that (according to a taxi-driver) would turn him from a calm and happy man into a miserable, tense one. To me, it just felt inappropriate to skip lightly over these subjects, or indeed over Elwood's obviously all-too-real alcoholism, with the suggestion that they didn't really matter, since Harvey was real after all.

Still, James Stewart is awfully easy on the eye, and he got to deliver some great lines - like, "I'd just put Ed Hickey into a taxi. Ed had been mixing his rye with his gin, and I just felt that he needed conveying." So by no means a wasted evening, and it still had that Cottage Classic magic - but just with a slightly weird edge.

Click here if you would like view this entry in light text on a dark background.

strange_complex: (Me Huginn beak kiss)
And this one I saw a fortnight ago, again with [livejournal.com profile] ms_siobhan and [livejournal.com profile] planet_andy, but this time at the Media Museum in Bradford. It's actually a documentary, charting the history of the Alternative Miss World contest - a sort of bohemian art event that the sculptor Andrew Logan has been running since the early seventies. I hadn't heard of it before, but it looks amazing - all about encouraging unbridled, experimental creativity, including challenging gender boundaries, mainstream fashion paradigms and so forth. It reminded me rather a lot of some of the masked balls I've been to, but on a far grander and crazier scale.

The structure of the documentary splices the long-term history of Andrew Logan as an artist and the contest since 1972 with a shorter-scale micro-history of his preparations for the most recent event in 2009. He comes across as a lovely guy - very passionate about his work, keen to share it with as many people as possible, and with a great sense of humour about the contest, including its trials and tribulations. There was absolutely no pretentiousness about him, but just the very Britishness of the title - tongue-in-cheek self-deprecation about the whole process, but coupled with an underlying steely dedication to putting on the best contest yet.

The visual style of the documentary really did its subject justice, too. The early contests in particular are only preserved via a few fairly grainy photos, but the design made a virtue of this by using a scrap-booking aesthetic, with lots of collage-style images made up of still photos, decorative images and some animation, all inter-spliced with the standard documentary-style footage of the preparations for the 2009 contest. We all agreed afterwards that it was very much like Terry Gilliam's contributions to the Monty Python experience, complete with the same aura of British surrealist humour.

I don't know how widely this is showing, but I imagine it will crop up on late-night Channel 4 at some stage. If you like watching people pushing the boundaries of costume, fashion and identity, it's worth checking out.

Click here if you would like view this entry in light text on a dark background.

Profile

strange_complex: (Default)
strange_complex

January 2025

M T W T F S S
  12345
6 789101112
131415161718 19
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sunday, 24 August 2025 09:30
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios