4. Secretary (2002), dir. Steven Shainberg
Sunday, 19 February 2012 11:09A friend lent me this, and it lay around unwatched in my lounge for about a fortnight because it looked kind of dire from the box. What I was getting from the packaging was 'rom-com with a mild male-fantasy-style kink twist'. But now that I've actually sat down and watched it, I think it's only fair to say that it was quite a lot more character-driven and intelligent than that would suggest.
The blurb on the back of the box reads as follows:
Around that strong central plot, there is a lot of ( intelligent detail and design )
But there were some things about the film I wasn't so keen on, and that includes the ( happily-ever-after ending )
On the whole, though, not bad at all. It's just a pity that it is packaged and marketed as a less interesting film than it actually is.
Click here if you would like view this entry in light text on a dark background.
The blurb on the back of the box reads as follows:
"When Lee Holloway (Maggie Gyllenhaal) gets a job as a secretary in a small firm she does her best to please. But her new boss (James Spader) finds fault with her typing and administers a rather unconventional kind of punishment. Soon Lee realises that she is not only becoming the perfect secretary, but also the woman she always wanted to be."But what that doesn't really convey is that the film isn't just 'secretary and her boss start an S&M relationship' (which would be quite dull and almost certainly misogynistic and shot through with clichés and moral hypocrisy), but that it is also ( a story of genuine character growth )
Around that strong central plot, there is a lot of ( intelligent detail and design )
But there were some things about the film I wasn't so keen on, and that includes the ( happily-ever-after ending )
On the whole, though, not bad at all. It's just a pity that it is packaged and marketed as a less interesting film than it actually is.
Click here if you would like view this entry in light text on a dark background.