strange_complex: (Room with a View kiss)
[personal profile] strange_complex
I did enjoy this, but by the time I got to about chapter 9, I began to feel that it didn't quite have the same depth and complexity as the other Austen novels I've read to date: Pride and Prejudice and Emma. I wondered whether this might be because it was an earlier effort that the other two, and when I checked, this turned out to be true - although she actually also wrote Pride and Prejudice between her original draft of S&S and the final, and significantly revised, published version, so things are a bit more complicated than their publication dates alone would suggest.

Compared to Austen's other novels, even the main characters here feel rather like stereotypes, and although Marianne in particular does develop over the course of the novel, it is not a particularly surprising or challenging course of development. The three men who become involved in the sisters' lives also seem rather deficient from a 21st-century point of view. Willoughby is a slimy, lying bastard, Edward Ferrars is as dull as ditchwater, and Colonel Brandon is self-centred and manipulative. I'm particularly curious as to whether Austen meant Willoughby's 'explanation' of his behaviour towards Marianne to sound convincing or reasonable. Since the sister who represents 'Sense' is swayed by it, I can only assume so, but to me it read like the worst kind of back-pedalling worming - the sort of stuff which the Sex and the City girls would see straight through. Then again, the entire plot revolves around social norms which Carrie and her friends would laugh at, so it's hardly fair to hold it up to the same standards.

The social satire and humour I associate with Austen is definitely here, though. I especially enjoyed Mr. Palmer and his wife as comic characters, although that view may be partly influenced by Hugh Laurie's brilliant performance as Mr. Palmer in the film. I also found myself wondering, in the light of Clueless, how this novel would play as a high school drama - and I think the answer is extremely well. Compared to most adult women today, the concerns and priorities of Austen's characters do appear rather green and teenaged, and if marriage to a man of fortune is only replaced by an invite to the prom date from a member of the high-school band, football team or whatever, the rest of the plot continues to work pretty well.

Finally, I owe an apology to the author of An American Boy. I complained when I read that about what seemed to me the over-done mannerism of writing all street-names in the format 'Wellington-terrace' instead of 'Wellington Terrace', feeling that it was a case of trying too hard to evoke a period feel. But it really is exactly what Jane Austen does with total consistency throughout this book - along with other idiosyncratic spellings like 'chuse', 'shew' and most interestingly 'our's' and 'her's'. I like that last one particularly, because it is one in the eye for the people who seem to believe that there was once a Golden Age of spelling in which everyone knew exactly how to use an apostrophe. I fear there never was - but I also believe that is no reason not to try to create one in the present.

Click here to view this entry with minimal formatting.

Date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 21:03 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lefaym.livejournal.com
I expect that using apostrophes on possessive pronouns (along with her alternate spellings) was probably quite acceptable in Austen's time, and that the standards simply hadn't been implimented as rigidly as they have been today-- personally, I find that using apostrophes for possessive pronouns makes far more sense than not, but The Powers That Be decided otherwise, I guess.

One thing I always really liked about Sense and Sensibility is the way that Elinor and Marianne are both portrayed as having a very active intellectual life. While Elizabeth and Darcy discuss the merits of reading to improve one's mind, and it's clear that Elizabeth has the mental capacity to do so, Austen's narrator also makes it quite clear that Elizabeth isn't really the bookish type, while Mary's attempts to engage intellectually are seen as a cause for ridicule.

Date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 21:23 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miss-next.livejournal.com
I don't see Edward as being dull; I see him as a shy, honest man caught in a seemingly impossible situation, and I have a great deal of sympathy for him. But then I've always identified strongly with Elinor in any case!

Date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 21:32 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] biascut.livejournal.com
Sense and Sensibility is the only Austen I got bored with and never got around to finishing - and thinking about it, that applies to both the book and the Emma Thompson film version!

Date: Saturday, 31 January 2009 21:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrkgnao.livejournal.com
I really enjoy your book reviews.

It is a difficult book, and I can never quite work out what I think about it, or the characters.

The film is enchanting though, which influences more than it probably should.

I'm particularly curious as to whether Austen meant Willoughby's 'explanation' of his behaviour towards Marianne to sound convincing or reasonable.

I really glad you picked up on this, because it's something I've always wondered about. I'm genuinely bewildered as to why Elinor is taken in, since she's supposed to be so level headed, but is this meant to be a marker of just how convincing a slimy bastard he is? Or does it mean there's some merit in him somewhere. Gargh! I mean, Elinor is pretty much our marker of sanity for the rest of the book.

Also, being a secret Marianne myself, I always feel terrible for her. Yes, she behaves like an idiot but she's so ... broken ... by the end of it that it upsets me.

Date: Sunday, 1 February 2009 00:46 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] robert-jones.livejournal.com
I think it's fair to say that Austen's spelling was considered idiosyncratic by the standards of her own age. Also, if there was a Golden Age of spelling, it was about 70 years later.

Date: Sunday, 1 February 2009 10:48 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] aliceinfinland.livejournal.com
I enjoy your reviews too! And yes, the street name hyphenation is authentic - the New-York Times (sic) did it consistently in the 19th c.

Date: Sunday, 1 February 2009 14:08 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-d-medievalist.livejournal.com
You make me want to re-read it (again). I've always liked S&S, and I think have seen some of the things you point out as being part of the changes that both Elinor and Marianne go through, so that each of them becomes just a bit more balanced.

Profile

strange_complex: (Default)
strange_complex

January 2025

M T W T F S S
  12345
6 789101112
131415161718 19
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Monday, 14 July 2025 10:24
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios