Date: Thursday, 20 January 2011 14:14 (UTC)
fearmeforiampink: (More things to say)
Aye. From street stalls, I've heard a few "No, because the Lib Dem's want it" responses, but not that many, and rather less than the "Yes, definitely!" ones, and yeah, once explained most people that didn't know it the response is nearly always positive.

In the phone banks I've not been calling much, generally I've been data entering, inducting, and keeping half an ear on our side of the calls to make sure people aren't swearing down the phone at the people we're canvassing.

But from our side of the conversation and talking to the volunteers doing the calling, the response is positive – a number of strong 'No' responses, but more strong 'Yes', and a lot of weak 'Yes', some of those being unaware of it 'till we called, but positive after our explanation. Thankfully only one or two "PR or nothing" responses.

Though on the phone banks the response isn't neccessarily as indicative, as those are targeted (so far as is possible with the data we have) at the people we think are going to be weak Yes or weak No, as the former can be firmed, the latter persuaded over to our side.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

strange_complex: (Default)
strange_complex

January 2026

M T W T F S S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, 6 January 2026 06:28
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios