strange_complex: (TARDIS)
[personal profile] strange_complex
I've just been out to the doctor to get my annual 'flu1 vaccination. I qualify for a free one every year because of my asthma, and have been having them for six years now: ever since I actually did get 'flu over Christmas 1999, and realised that a small amount of forward planning and a slight prick in the arm was more than worth going through each year in order to avoid it.

So, the jab went fine. I hardly felt it, and that's another 'flu-free winter to look forward to. But while I was there, I noticed the leaflets the NHS have printed up this year to encourage those in vulnerable groups2 to get the injection:

Flu booklet.jpg


Let's take a closer look at those little gremlins, shall we?

Flu gremlin.jpg


Now is that, or is that not, the Jagrafess? Hmm? Is that its goal in the 21st century, then: to take control of Earth through the medium of viral infection? Is that what the NHS are desperately trying to tell us by printing suggestive pictures of it on their literature? Has it had itself cloned and miniaturised a billion times over for an attack not unlike that of the Swarm in The Invisible Enemy? Is it a coincidence that that very story also saw the debut of the lovable K-9, who is set to return to our screens this coming spring? Will he, by then, be deeply involved in a real-life battle against the new and mysterious Jagrafess virus?

And do I now know far more about Doctor Who than I thought I did or ever expected to? I may be protected against the Jagrafess now, but you lot clearly took over my brain some time ago...

------------
1. That's 'flu as in Actual Influenza: not the same as a cold. Even a bad cold.
2. For the record, you qualify if you're over 65, or have kidney disease, diabetes, reduced immunity or any serious chest or heart complaint, including asthma. If that's you, get it! Don't have 'flu.

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 12:42 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angeoverhere.livejournal.com
Being also a sciencemedia geek, I happen to know that this campaign was running last autumn as well, because I used it in my teaching. So unless they nicked the Jagrafess from the NHS, there might be a small problem with your theory*

*yes I know, timetravel, etc.

On the other hand, both of 'em look rather like the head of a lamprey (nasty jawless parasitic fishthing):
Image

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 12:47 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Penelope Pitstop)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Eep! *jumps away from screen* It's trying to get me!

Mind you, the whole point of the Jagrafess is that it was itself manipulating the world's media, so maybe it has engineered its own presence on 21st century Earth in both the NHS literature and Doctor Who? Maybe it's planned a subtle long-term campaign whereby we are increasingly exposed to its image, until we come to love it and covet it and welcome it with open arms to our juicy and succulent planet?

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 12:49 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damien-mocata.livejournal.com
Or is the Jagrafess merely a mutation of Influenza? :)

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 13:21 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Penelope Pitstop)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Eep! again. It's the dreaded Claw! *runs away*

And perhaps you're right. Maybe it's a giant influenza virus that has grown to 10 trillion times its original size thanks to nuclear radiation?

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 20:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] captainlucy.livejournal.com
Don't worry, Penelope! We'll saves ya! :D

Of course it's grown to immense size because of radiation. Doesn't everything? ;)

Image

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 20:44 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Ariel squee)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Yay! icon.

And is that kitten incredibly scary - or incredibly cute? I'm so confused!

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 21:33 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angeoverhere.livejournal.com
Cute I think - was wondering if I could attempt to icon it - would that be OK?

Date: Friday, 14 October 2005 00:34 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] damien-mocata.livejournal.com
*insert maniacal laughter*

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 17:56 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-flay.livejournal.com
I don't know if you recall, but one Hallowe'en, we saw a tv programme with some nutter exposing himself to many "natural bloodsuckers" (hence the Hallowe'en connection, haha, how terribly witty, I can well imagine some programming commissioner slapping himself on the back over that one, bloody schedulers, *mutter* *curse*), including fleas, ticks and lampreys.

He waded around up to his knees in stagnant water, and sure enough, a lamprey soon clamped on to his calf. It was not pretty. *shudder*

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 18:52 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Redneck damn toot!)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Oh, believe me, I've never forgotten! I had forgotten the Halloween connection, but the image of that guy with lampreys trailing from his leg has never left me!

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 14:16 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-lady-lily.livejournal.com
I've never quite understood why anyone one want to die of a surfeit of those.

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 14:19 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Claudius)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
I thought Vedius Pollio's victims were largely unwilling?

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 14:29 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-lady-lily.livejournal.com
It was not Vedius Pollio I had in mind, but King Henry I (1068-1135) of England, who the chronicles reported as dying from a "surfeit of lampreys," of all things.

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 14:42 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Leela Ooh)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Ah! I suppose there's no chance he ate too many, or anything slightly-less-unplesant lke that? I know the Romans liked to have a good munch on a lamprey when they got the chance.

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 14:57 (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-lady-lily.livejournal.com
He was, apparently, known for his gluttony where lamphreys were concerned. Which brings me back to my original question - why anyone would have chosen to die of eating those things is beyond me ;)

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 15:04 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Janus)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Still, got to be better than being eaten by them, eh?

Date: Thursday, 13 October 2005 15:22 (UTC)

Profile

strange_complex: (Default)
strange_complex

January 2025

M T W T F S S
  12345
6 789101112
131415161718 19
20212223242526
2728293031  

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, 3 October 2025 22:44
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios