So how about Rome, then?
Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:02![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Initial reaction - I liked it a lot. Good characterisations, plenty of interesting details to look out for in the sets, and accessible without being too patronising. Sure, there are some historical liberties being taken. If little Octavius ever got captured by Pompey's agents in Gaul, the event was so successfully hushed up that there's absolutely no trace of it left anywhere, in any of the historical records. But it developed his character, and also helped to clarify the enmity between Pompey and Caesar.
I'm pleased, in fact, to see Octavius taking such a central role. In fact, I'd go as far right now as to say that it looks to my eye very much as though the whole production has really been conceived from the start as his story. Not Julius Caesar's, not Mark Antony's. It starts at the very point when the young Octavius is just beginning to become actively involved in the affairs of his family and the politics of Rome. Of course, his story involves some major secondary players, and I'm sure they will have their moments. But in terms of the grand arc of the production, it looks to me as though it is his life story that will form the central peg on which all others hang. And so it should, because he is amazing.
It's a pity, that being the case, that they've got his name wrong. He didn't officially become Octavian(us) until adopted by Julius Caesar, and he didn't use the name himself even then. And a pity that we didn't get to see his first real major public appearance in Rome - the delivery of the funeral oration for his dead grandmother, Julia. But I suppose that that would only have worked for an audience familiar with the device of the Roman funeral oration, and who wants to hear a long boring speech anyway, when they can see him nearly getting killed in Gaul?
On the plus side, his costume was excellent (a bulla! and a toga praetexta!), his physical appearance convincingly like his later portrait images (as indeed was the case for most of the major characters) and his characterisation just perfect. The nerdy kid with a vicious streak, already unnervingly au fait with Roman politics and keen to manipulate and control. Oh yes, all just ready to flower into a most excellent Augustus.
I look forward to seeing more: of him, of the sets, and of the fine details of HBO's Roman world.
Edited 03/11/05 to correct mistake about Julia.

I'm pleased, in fact, to see Octavius taking such a central role. In fact, I'd go as far right now as to say that it looks to my eye very much as though the whole production has really been conceived from the start as his story. Not Julius Caesar's, not Mark Antony's. It starts at the very point when the young Octavius is just beginning to become actively involved in the affairs of his family and the politics of Rome. Of course, his story involves some major secondary players, and I'm sure they will have their moments. But in terms of the grand arc of the production, it looks to me as though it is his life story that will form the central peg on which all others hang. And so it should, because he is amazing.
It's a pity, that being the case, that they've got his name wrong. He didn't officially become Octavian(us) until adopted by Julius Caesar, and he didn't use the name himself even then. And a pity that we didn't get to see his first real major public appearance in Rome - the delivery of the funeral oration for his dead grandmother, Julia. But I suppose that that would only have worked for an audience familiar with the device of the Roman funeral oration, and who wants to hear a long boring speech anyway, when they can see him nearly getting killed in Gaul?
On the plus side, his costume was excellent (a bulla! and a toga praetexta!), his physical appearance convincingly like his later portrait images (as indeed was the case for most of the major characters) and his characterisation just perfect. The nerdy kid with a vicious streak, already unnervingly au fait with Roman politics and keen to manipulate and control. Oh yes, all just ready to flower into a most excellent Augustus.
I look forward to seeing more: of him, of the sets, and of the fine details of HBO's Roman world.
Edited 03/11/05 to correct mistake about Julia.

no subject
Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:22 (UTC)I'm sure Vercingetorix could have afforded a barber, too.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:30 (UTC)Pullo I liked more than I expected, and Vorenus too. I didn't expect to be keen on either of them, because they're not historically documented, and have obviously been inserted to give us 'ordinary' characters to relate to. But I was wrong, and being snobbish - in fact, the series does need characters like that. They're well-fleshed-out and promise to become more so, and they give us access to parts of the Roman world that we wouldn't so readily get to see through the historical characters (like prison cells, gambling dens and brothels). They've been put together very plausibly to fill the gaps which an elite-centric written record leaves for us, and to allow HBO to convey a wider view of the Roman world.
So hooray for them.
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:53 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:57 (UTC)And telepathy - of course! But then again, what were either of us going to do after posting about Rome than trawl LJ looking for other posts about it to comment on? :)
no subject
Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 22:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 06:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:22 (UTC)no subject
Date: Wednesday, 2 November 2005 23:39 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:16 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:17 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:52 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 07:41 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 08:47 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 08:26 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 08:53 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:21 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:30 (UTC)There were a lot of familiar faces, but not famous enough to get in the way. I also love the way that posh Brits make such good Romans..
no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:43 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 09:53 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 10:10 (UTC)no subject
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2005 10:40 (UTC)