strange_complex: (Doctor Caecilius hands)
[personal profile] strange_complex
Having had a few hours to think about it, I've become more concerned than I was yesterday about the treatment of the character Rosita in yesterday's Christmas special.

When the story began, the opening scenes in the market showed at least one little black kid running around with the other urchins in the snow, and I thought "Ooh! It's not just Rosita, then. We have total colour-blind casting here. Exciting!" Except that the way Rosita was treated then made me wonder if colour-blind casting is really possible in Doctor Who, or indeed if the BBC have actually managed to achieve it here.

Apparently, it says somewhere on the official site that Rosita's name was meant to be a reference to both Rose and Martha. But as people in the thread I've linked to have pointed out, '-ita' is not really very much like '-tha'. So if the character is meant to be reminiscent of Martha in some way, and her name doesn't really convey that, we're left with the uncomfortable possibility that her resemblance to Martha actually rests in: the fact that the actress is black. Because all black people are clearly the same, yo. Would the BBC have suggested that Astrid in last year's special was meant to be a reference to Rose because they are both white? I don't think so.

Add onto that the fact that this character, who is played by a black actress, is a prostitute (not in the script, but also stated by the actress herself in clips on the website), gets to do precious little on her own initiative throughout the story, and at the end is conveniently slotted into the role of nursemaid and (implicitly) sexual partner because it suits the needs of the white man, and you're really treading on very thin ice indeed.

The problem at the end of the story, of course, is that the historical setting means that, if the actress' black skin-colour is taken into account, there is no other way to suggest a romantic happy ending for her and Jackson Lake. A white middle-class man of that era would never have dreamed of marrying a black woman - and the script-writers clearly felt that they could not carry colour-blindness far enough to have him do so. The result is that she is condemned to the racist Mammy stereotype.

And that's shoddy enough where Velile Tshabalala is concerned. But the reason this really worries me is because of the rumours flying around connecting Paterson Joseph with the role of the next Doctor. Currently, Who's production team are trying to be ethnically inclusive by casting black actors in the roles of characters who, ten or more years ago, would almost certainly be played by white actors. But they are still falling into the trap of then writing racist stereotypes into the portrayal of those characters.

If a black actor is truly to be cast as the next Doctor, a major leap forward needs to be taken first if these issues are going to be resolved. Are the Who team really ready to take such a step? On the basis of last night's special, Ah hae me doots.

Click here to view this entry with minimal formatting.

Date: Friday, 26 December 2008 13:23 (UTC)
nwhyte: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nwhyte
It's not even true that an inter-racial marriage was unthinkable. Vanity Fair, which is set several decades earlier, has two black characters who both end up marrying English people of their own class. Granted, one is a plantation heiress and the other a footman, so it's not as good a witness to middle-class behaviour, but the point remains. (Long John Silver, in Treasure Island, is also explicitly married to a black woman.)

This all further weakens the script's suggestion that nursemaid-plus-fuckbuddy is the optimal outcome for Rosita.

I am convinced that this was a line that sounded better inside RTD's head than it did when delivered.

Date: Friday, 26 December 2008 13:35 (UTC)
nwhyte: (shocked and surprised)
From: [personal profile] nwhyte
(Though that last bit - where it sounded much better inside your head - can happen to any of us.)

Date: Friday, 26 December 2008 16:12 (UTC)
ext_550458: (Penelope Pitstop)
From: [identity profile] strange-complex.livejournal.com
Hehe - yes, indeed it can. :-)

Profile

strange_complex: (Default)
strange_complex

January 2026

M T W T F S S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Page Summary

Active Entries

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Tuesday, 3 February 2026 15:10
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios