New Who November special: Waters of Mars
Sunday, 15 November 2009 20:26Hmm, I guess that was OK, but not exceptional. It felt like a re-run of The Impossible Planet / The Satan Pit (which, OK, it was owning to a certain extent by putting the Doctor in the same space-suit), but just tweaked to bring out what RTD obviously wanted to be the main theme: the Doctor going too far and setting himself up as the ultimate authority over time.
That said, given my current interest in the way early Doctor Who dealt with history, I did find the way this story played around with the same theme very interesting. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time in Doctor Who that events in the future, rather than the past, have been treated as fixed and unchangeable - which, of course, turned out to be necessary at the end of the story when the Doctor did try to change them after all. It was particularly striking to see that the main device used to establish as fixed the events of a 'history' which the audience doesn't actually know was written text. This is a very common point of reference in early Who - as Steven asks in The Time Meddler when Vicki explains that the Monk is trying to change time, "What about the history books?" So it was fascinating to see the same appeal to written text as an unshakeable authority which cannot be changed, even when the story had no basis in 'real' history at all.
Other than that, it's painfully obvious that the original plan was for this story to be broadcast on Saturday November 21st. Nice try, there, but oops! Lindsay Duncan is still HOT at 59. And yay for references to the Ice Warriors, The Thing, the X-Files episode Ice, and I think also 28 Days Later when one crew member was infected by a drop of water in his eye, and tried to shout to the others to get away before he 'turned'.
Er, and that's it, really. Nothing much else of substance or depth that I could see. But can't wait for the Christmas / New Year's specials, all the same!
Click here to view this entry with minimal formatting.

That said, given my current interest in the way early Doctor Who dealt with history, I did find the way this story played around with the same theme very interesting. To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time in Doctor Who that events in the future, rather than the past, have been treated as fixed and unchangeable - which, of course, turned out to be necessary at the end of the story when the Doctor did try to change them after all. It was particularly striking to see that the main device used to establish as fixed the events of a 'history' which the audience doesn't actually know was written text. This is a very common point of reference in early Who - as Steven asks in The Time Meddler when Vicki explains that the Monk is trying to change time, "What about the history books?" So it was fascinating to see the same appeal to written text as an unshakeable authority which cannot be changed, even when the story had no basis in 'real' history at all.
Other than that, it's painfully obvious that the original plan was for this story to be broadcast on Saturday November 21st. Nice try, there, but oops! Lindsay Duncan is still HOT at 59. And yay for references to the Ice Warriors, The Thing, the X-Files episode Ice, and I think also 28 Days Later when one crew member was infected by a drop of water in his eye, and tried to shout to the others to get away before he 'turned'.
Er, and that's it, really. Nothing much else of substance or depth that I could see. But can't wait for the Christmas / New Year's specials, all the same!
Click here to view this entry with minimal formatting.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 15 November 2009 20:56 (UTC)Even the dead-in-5-mins dude had an interesting character. plus the whole thing seemed better paced, and with less deus ex machina... ah well. If it didn't grab you, fair enough, but I thought it was rather a few solid notches above The Impossible Planet / The Satan Pit.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 15 November 2009 22:44 (UTC)- K
no subject
Date: Sunday, 15 November 2009 23:24 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 17 November 2009 00:16 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 16 November 2009 11:07 (UTC)I really must buy some X-Files on DVD, as last night left me desperate to watch that episode again. I remember it as super-scary.
no subject
Date: Monday, 16 November 2009 20:25 (UTC)no subject
Date: Tuesday, 17 November 2009 00:12 (UTC)a) An OK episode and much better than the film Knowing that we watched the night before (don't watch it, it's not worth it)
b) The Doctor gloated too much, an easy plot device, and one I don't like to see in modern SF
c) Why Adelaide topped herself. She had a loving daughter and grandaughter, whatever the Dr had (evilly???) told her about her future, she still had an obligation to them.
An interesting episode, but it left a nasty taste in my mouth, had to watch a Star Trek to get happy again. Will it be resolved at Christmas?
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 17 November 2009 10:19 (UTC)Anyway, yes, the going-too-far stuff is very definitely meant to be setting the scene for the Christmas and New Year specials, which will see Ten finally coming to a sticky end. I think that promises to be quite a satisfying and appropriate end to his story arc when it happens. But in this story it all felt somewhat awkwardly and unconvincingly bolted on to a fairly standard base-under-siege scenario to me.
no subject
Date: Tuesday, 17 November 2009 19:33 (UTC)