New Who 5.12: The Pandorica Opens
Saturday, 19 June 2010 23:53Well, that was pretty damned clever, wasn't it? RTD set out explicitly to ask questions which Classic Who had always left unresolved - like what about the companions' families? And what happens to them after they've left the TARDIS? Now Moffat is doing the same thing, but on the level of grand plots rather than small, human characters. What if all the Doctor's enemies worked together for once? And what if he was the one causing the universe to implode? They're important questions, and it's great to see them being explored.
I'm very impressed by all the people over on
doctorwho who have been insisting for weeks that they saw someone moving around in Amy's house with a torch before Amy and the Doctor had got in there at the end of Flesh and Stone. We now know that they were dead right, and it was River. And I'm entirely prepared to believe that there will be more of this. Maybe jacket!Doctor is a projection of himself which he somehow manages from within the Pandorica? Not substantial enough to really do anything in the immediate present, but capable of projecting himself into bits of his own past to direct Amy (who surely won't really be dead) in the way he needs?
River generally was cool, of course. Very James Bondish, offering the blue guy in the bar the cure to the micro-explosives she's just slipped into his drink. And I also liked the idea of the Doctor's massed adversaries drawing on all Amy's childhood memories to create a scenario that she would believe, and that would therefore draw him in. I thought that was a nice comment on the role of the companion in helping the Doctor to connect meaningfully with the worlds and people he encounters.
Obviously the Romans were great, even when they turned out to be fake plastic Romans. In fact, I thought the way they were handled was very clever, really. Because what can the Romans ever be to us but pictures in books and little plastic soldiers which we bring to life with our minds? Normally Doctor Who indulges us in the fantasy that we can travel into the reality of the past - at least vicariously through the Doctor and his companions, anyway. But this time it made us think we were meeting real Romans, and then pulled the rug from under that, and made them explicitly fake after all. Very, very meta-referential.
Yet at the same time, the Doctor also keeps telling us that "if something can be remembered, it can come back". Obviously the immediate in-plot resonances of this are to do with Amy and Rory. But it's also as though, at the same time that Moffat is reminding us that Romans-on-TV aren't real, he's also saying that the real past does have genuine power and presence so long as we collectively remember it. I am so glad that Moffat chose to hang all this around an example from ancient history, rather than any other time period. ♥.
But that wasn't the only fun Moffat was having with history anyway. Amy's question about why Stonehenge doesn't look new in AD 102 draws our attention to how hard it is for human beings to really grasp the concept of long time periods. River playing at being Cleopatra in AD 102, and all the Roman legionaries falling for it, was good too - and in retrospect a pointer to the fact that none of the legionaries themselves were 'real' historical personalities either. And I couldn't help but fixate on the Doctor's line to Rory: "She's Amy and she's surrounded by Romans. Not sure history can take it." I know it was primarily just a joke, but there's a little baby nod to the idea of the Doctor as a defender of the course of Earth history in there somewhere, too.
And letting River get to start history off with the earliest written inscription was awesome! The Greek lettering, incidentally, began with the letters 'Theta Sigma' - i.e. the Doctor's Academy nickname. The rest didn't seem to mean anything I could work out, though. They ran 'Phi GAP Gamma Upsilon Delta an-archaic-form-of-Sigma'. It would be very odd to use that last letter in an inscription which also has the more regular classical-period Sigma; and I can't really make any sense out of the rest. So I guess it is either just meant to be the coordinates that the Doctor is talking about in the next scene, or maybe 'hello' in Old High Gallifreyan (to go with 'Theta Sigma' essentially meaning 'sweetie').
A few random questions which occurred to me:
Click here to view this entry with minimal formatting.

I'm very impressed by all the people over on
River generally was cool, of course. Very James Bondish, offering the blue guy in the bar the cure to the micro-explosives she's just slipped into his drink. And I also liked the idea of the Doctor's massed adversaries drawing on all Amy's childhood memories to create a scenario that she would believe, and that would therefore draw him in. I thought that was a nice comment on the role of the companion in helping the Doctor to connect meaningfully with the worlds and people he encounters.
Obviously the Romans were great, even when they turned out to be fake plastic Romans. In fact, I thought the way they were handled was very clever, really. Because what can the Romans ever be to us but pictures in books and little plastic soldiers which we bring to life with our minds? Normally Doctor Who indulges us in the fantasy that we can travel into the reality of the past - at least vicariously through the Doctor and his companions, anyway. But this time it made us think we were meeting real Romans, and then pulled the rug from under that, and made them explicitly fake after all. Very, very meta-referential.
Yet at the same time, the Doctor also keeps telling us that "if something can be remembered, it can come back". Obviously the immediate in-plot resonances of this are to do with Amy and Rory. But it's also as though, at the same time that Moffat is reminding us that Romans-on-TV aren't real, he's also saying that the real past does have genuine power and presence so long as we collectively remember it. I am so glad that Moffat chose to hang all this around an example from ancient history, rather than any other time period. ♥.
But that wasn't the only fun Moffat was having with history anyway. Amy's question about why Stonehenge doesn't look new in AD 102 draws our attention to how hard it is for human beings to really grasp the concept of long time periods. River playing at being Cleopatra in AD 102, and all the Roman legionaries falling for it, was good too - and in retrospect a pointer to the fact that none of the legionaries themselves were 'real' historical personalities either. And I couldn't help but fixate on the Doctor's line to Rory: "She's Amy and she's surrounded by Romans. Not sure history can take it." I know it was primarily just a joke, but there's a little baby nod to the idea of the Doctor as a defender of the course of Earth history in there somewhere, too.
And letting River get to start history off with the earliest written inscription was awesome! The Greek lettering, incidentally, began with the letters 'Theta Sigma' - i.e. the Doctor's Academy nickname. The rest didn't seem to mean anything I could work out, though. They ran 'Phi GAP Gamma Upsilon Delta an-archaic-form-of-Sigma'. It would be very odd to use that last letter in an inscription which also has the more regular classical-period Sigma; and I can't really make any sense out of the rest. So I guess it is either just meant to be the coordinates that the Doctor is talking about in the next scene, or maybe 'hello' in Old High Gallifreyan (to go with 'Theta Sigma' essentially meaning 'sweetie').
A few random questions which occurred to me:
- How does hallucinogenic lipstick actually work? Doesn't it affect the wearer, as well as people she kisses?
- What's the stone wall which River sees when she opens the TARDIS doors? Is it part of Stonehenge? Surely the TARDIS explosion can't blow up Stonehenge - especially since it seemed to be in exactly the same state of ruination which it is now already.
- If the whole thing with the Pandorica is a trap set up by the Doctor's collected enemies, who damaged that Cyberman that was left lying around in pieces at Stonehenge? There's clearly been some kind of fight, there - so who was involved?
- I know it isn't really likely to happen for boring real-world reasons. But if the Pandorica combined with Stonehenge is broadcasting a signal which brings the Eleventh Doctor to see what's going on, isn't is just possible that earlier Doctors (or indeed later ones, for that matter), might hear it too? Even just the Tenth would be nice.
Click here to view this entry with minimal formatting.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 00:14 (UTC)Trying to see this, are they definitely saying Flesh and Stone, before the light goes on in Amy's room?
Because it's on screen for all of half a second, at most, and I really can't see any movement. So either it's a different scene, and I can't think of any, or it's only visible on the HD version, which I can't watch, or they were seeing things, but they happen to be right anyway.
See, I was more reminded of Locke Lamora (well, book 2), but it's not exactly an unused trope. Rather nasty though.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 10:53 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 20:55 (UTC)It doesn't give an arrival time for her, but it could be at any point after midnight, but not before.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 02:02 (UTC)How does hallucinogenic lipstick actually work? Doesn't it affect the wearer, as well as people she kisses?
My presumption is that it's something that River is possibly immune to, by some way of application (like never letting her lips touch), or that she's engineered immune to (having a gene sequence immunity).
What's the stone wall which River sees when she opens the TARDIS doors? Is it part of Stonehenge? Surely the TARDIS explosion can't blow up Stonehenge - especially since it seemed to be in exactly the same state of ruination which it is now already.
This wouldn't be the first time the TARDIS has done something metaphoric as a literal suggestion. After all, back in "The Edge of Destruction", the clock runs backward and melts because they're running out of time. I get the feeling the wall is a metaphor for "We should never have come here because we'll never leave. "
If the whole thing with the Pandorica is a trap set up by the Doctor's collected enemies, who damaged that Cyberman that was left lying around in pieces at Stonehenge? There's clearly been some kind of fight, there - so who was involved?
The Doctor does mention that the locals (i.e. Celts) are violent, and as Roman weapons are shown to actually kill and dismember a Cyberman, I imagine it's someone on Earth. Big question is why was the stupid thing wandering around outside it's ward?
I know it isn't really likely to happen for boring real-world reasons. But if the Pandorica combined with Stonehenge is broadcasting a signal which brings the Eleventh Doctor to see what's going on, isn't is just possible that earlier Doctors (or indeed later ones, for that matter), might hear it too? Even just the Tenth would be nice.
I don't think any Doctor can receive the signal because it's been engineered so that he can't! After all, The Daleks are now (in theory) the only race out there that can reliably time travel, so perhaps the signal is invisible to detection by a TARDIS (that said, I think the line of "The Doctor is the only one who can operate the TARDIS" was a bit daft, mainly because Daleks can operate their own damn ones!
As an aside, something must have brought all those aliens there in the first place. We know Sontarans don't have time travel, and without using Untelevised adventures, not all those races have encountered the Doctor at this stage of Time.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 10:55 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010 22:03 (UTC)Don't they? Has Time Warrior been retconned out?
no subject
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010 22:50 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 07:58 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 10:31 (UTC)(This is just me spooling out old-fan knowledge...)
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 10:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:12 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:03 (UTC)jacket!doctor? I'm obviously forgetting something...
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:06 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:39 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:21 (UTC)Well, exactly. Most people can't grasp the idea that distant times may be distant from each other.
But equally, they find it hard to grasp the idea that distant places can be distant from each other - people always seem surprised that flying from Sydney to Auckland is about the same as flying from London to Athens.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:43 (UTC)Interesting commentary all round, though!
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 11:58 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 16:40 (UTC)either way, I don't think any episode has excited me before the begining credits as much as this one did............
(edited to clarify what bit I'm talking about)
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 17:44 (UTC)Interesting point about that line, too!
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 22:32 (UTC)(Actually the visions of the lineup of former Doctors also somehow reminds me of the vision of kings macbeth sees fromtghe witches. had SM been reading macbeth lately or am I just weirding? (I haven't read it since ooh 1978 or so..)
no subject
Date: Sunday, 20 June 2010 13:57 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010 01:39 (UTC)Most likely it was just a part of the trap -- keep him distracted and busy rather than thinking because if he was really thinking he'd have had to come up with a better explanation for, say, Rory being there.
I think the greek letters were just meant to be the co-ordinates and being in greek was just to give them a "sciency" feel. Could be interpreted as numbers? I think numbers are meant to have dashes though.
209 500 403 94
(I think) where I've taken the liberty of assuming the last four characters actually had a small gap in the middle. Doesn't mean anything though.
Not sure it is so meaningful.
no subject
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010 09:21 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 21 June 2010 01:57 (UTC)Dozens of possible ways the most obvious being she has taken the antidote beforehand or she is wearing an "undercoat" of something non permeable by the active chemical.
.What's the stone wall which River sees when she opens the TARDIS doors?
I presumed she had muffed the landing (she had been saying it wasn't safe to land) and landed actually inside something -- that is maybe underground.