New Who 6.1: The Impossible Astronaut
Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:33So Moffat certainly does love his historicals. I noted at the end of last season that he was delivering a hit-rate of historical stories almost equivalent to Doctor Who in the mid-'60s. And it's not just that the bulk of this episode was set in 1969. It was the tropes he was playing around with at the beginning that really struck me - because they came straight out of the mid-'60s episodes.
See, I've got a little file of all the times 'history books' were directly referred to in Doctor Who in the mid-'60s - usually so that they could stand for the established, 'objective' view of history, as known to humanity, which the Doctor's adventures would then subvert and dance between the lines of. And that's exactly what we got at the start of this episode, too, when Rory asked Amy, "Do you really think he's back there trying to wave to us out of the history books?"
And I've flagged up case after case of in-story use of television screens as a parallel for the real-life viewers' experience of following the Doctor's adventures on their own televisions. That one's not unique to the '60s - it's been deployed over and over again throughout Doctor Who's history, including as recently as Moffat's A Christmas Carol. But this week's specific device of placing the Doctor within a Laurel and Hardy film reminded me very strongly of some of the '60s examples of it, and particularly the First Doctor's visit to a silent film set in The Daleks' Master Plan.
So, in short, it's not just that Moffat is setting stories in the past a lot. It's that he seems to me to be doing it with a very strong awareness of how Doctor Who has done that same thing within its own past. Indeed, as I've also said before when commenting on Whovian historicals, there does seem to be a particular tendency for Doctor Who stories which are set in the (real) past to become commentaries on the show's own past as well. And I could definitely see that going on here.
But of course that is by no means all, because the new thing which Moffat has really contributed to Doctor Who's treatment of history is his trademark tangling of time-lines - which was once again absolutely central to this story. That makes it hard to assess this episode it is own right at the moment. We've seen terrible and amazing things, but we've also been reminded that time can be rewritten. So who knows how it will all pan out next week. I've just got three squees and a question, which are going safely behind a spoiler cut:
'Kay - till next week, then.
Click here if you would like view this entry in light text on a dark background.

See, I've got a little file of all the times 'history books' were directly referred to in Doctor Who in the mid-'60s - usually so that they could stand for the established, 'objective' view of history, as known to humanity, which the Doctor's adventures would then subvert and dance between the lines of. And that's exactly what we got at the start of this episode, too, when Rory asked Amy, "Do you really think he's back there trying to wave to us out of the history books?"
And I've flagged up case after case of in-story use of television screens as a parallel for the real-life viewers' experience of following the Doctor's adventures on their own televisions. That one's not unique to the '60s - it's been deployed over and over again throughout Doctor Who's history, including as recently as Moffat's A Christmas Carol. But this week's specific device of placing the Doctor within a Laurel and Hardy film reminded me very strongly of some of the '60s examples of it, and particularly the First Doctor's visit to a silent film set in The Daleks' Master Plan.
So, in short, it's not just that Moffat is setting stories in the past a lot. It's that he seems to me to be doing it with a very strong awareness of how Doctor Who has done that same thing within its own past. Indeed, as I've also said before when commenting on Whovian historicals, there does seem to be a particular tendency for Doctor Who stories which are set in the (real) past to become commentaries on the show's own past as well. And I could definitely see that going on here.
But of course that is by no means all, because the new thing which Moffat has really contributed to Doctor Who's treatment of history is his trademark tangling of time-lines - which was once again absolutely central to this story. That makes it hard to assess this episode it is own right at the moment. We've seen terrible and amazing things, but we've also been reminded that time can be rewritten. So who knows how it will all pan out next week. I've just got three squees and a question, which are going safely behind a spoiler cut:
- The TARDIS being drawn to landing on Saturdays - fits beautifully with the Doctor's claim in Silence in the Library that he never lands on Sundays because they're boring, and is a lovely meta-reference to the fact that the show broadcasts on Saturdays, too. So of course they're the best!
- Both versions of the Doctor greeting Rory as 'Rory the Roman'. That makes the Classicist in me cheer every time it's referenced - but it also looks like we're being reminded of it for foreshadowing reasons. Cannot wait to find out how and why.
- And that ship which River and Rory found in the tunnels underneath the abandoned warehouse looks like the same one (or the same type, at least) as the ship in The Lodger. That seems to fit in with the news that James Corden will be back at some point during the current series, and perhaps suggests that the story of exactly how the one from The Lodger came to be on top of his flat will extend beyond the confines of the current two-parter. Cool.
- And finally, if Amy feeling sick is television short-hand for her turning out to be pregnant, does that mean River, who felt sick while investigating the tunnels, is pregnant too? There's a lot of interesting potential there...
'Kay - till next week, then.
Click here if you would like view this entry in light text on a dark background.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 20:48 (UTC)When River felt sick I just assumed it must be a side-effect of the memory wipe, but the pregnancy does change that (if it's not just Amy's mind playing tricks with her by 'explaining' her sickness that way).
This is shaping up to be rather better than the last troglodytic race who've always been here but are hiding under ground, featuring Meera Syal.
River's speech about how her last (his first) meeting with the Doctor will kill her didn't gel very well with my memory of the jaunty River Song we saw when that meeting actually took place, in "Silence in the Library".
no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:27 (UTC)And I agree about River's speech about what her last meeting with the Doctor will be like not really matching Silence in the Library. Once her story arc is over, one thing I'd like to do is sit down and watch all her appearances in the order which she, rather than he, experienced them. I'd like to think Moffat is clever enough to have ensured that the journey makes not only plot-sense but emotional sense as well.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 20:53 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:20 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:36 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:58 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 April 2011 20:43 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 25 April 2011 16:30 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 25 April 2011 17:42 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:05 (UTC)I heard the Doctor saying 'Rory the Rover', though...
no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:33 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 April 2011 09:46 (UTC)(Still loving that icon.)
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 April 2011 20:18 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:35 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:56 (UTC)no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 22:01 (UTC)The patterns on the panel appear to be jolly similar though.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 23 April 2011 21:49 (UTC)no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 April 2011 08:46 (UTC)And finally, if Amy feeling sick is television short-hand for her turning out to be pregnant, does that mean River, who felt sick while investigating the tunnels, is pregnant too?
I'm guessing the Silents have made Amy think she's pregnant for some reason, as she and River both only started feeling sick after seeing them.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 April 2011 20:27 (UTC)if humans forget about the aliens every time they turn their backs (which I thought was an interesting kind of play on the Angels), how is it that the one in the ladies' room expects Amy to be able to tell the doctor.
I also wondered if Amy felt sick for the same reason as is making her flash in and out of what seem to be different times/timelines/realities.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 24 April 2011 20:38 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 25 April 2011 16:33 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 25 April 2011 19:10 (UTC)Any thoughts?
no subject
Date: Monday, 25 April 2011 19:30 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 25 April 2011 19:53 (UTC)