Six, seven, eight, nine, ten: then I let it go again.
Saturday, 16 April 2005 11:30![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Only yesterday, someone was assuring me that Christopher Ecclestone wasn't going to quit as the Doctor after all, but that it was all a publicity stunt to get people excited. Guess not...
I'm sure this David Tennant guy will be fine, although I didn't watch any of Casanova, so I can't really comment myself. But it just annoys me that a whole incarnation has been used up on only one series, especially given the previous one was wasted on only a one-and-a-half-hour film. There are only 12 to play with, and the remainder need to be conserved! *mutters things about responsibility in the general direction of Christopher Ecclestone*
Also, if this must happen, I'd ideally like to see an older Doctor follow Ecclestone, just to keep a bit of variety in the role. Sure, there's a fine tradition of younger Doctors to follow - especially Peter Davidson. But I'd like to see an actor who can tap into those aspects of the Doctor's character so splendidly explored by people like Jon Pertwee.

I'm sure this David Tennant guy will be fine, although I didn't watch any of Casanova, so I can't really comment myself. But it just annoys me that a whole incarnation has been used up on only one series, especially given the previous one was wasted on only a one-and-a-half-hour film. There are only 12 to play with, and the remainder need to be conserved! *mutters things about responsibility in the general direction of Christopher Ecclestone*
Also, if this must happen, I'd ideally like to see an older Doctor follow Ecclestone, just to keep a bit of variety in the role. Sure, there's a fine tradition of younger Doctors to follow - especially Peter Davidson. But I'd like to see an actor who can tap into those aspects of the Doctor's character so splendidly explored by people like Jon Pertwee.

no subject
Date: Saturday, 16 April 2005 14:14 (UTC)As for the stuff about Gallifrey, I'm probably not quite an avid enough fan to follow you properly there. I know Romana(etc.) was a Time Lord (Lady?), and I understand that Susan was the first assistant, and is referred to as the Doctor's grand-daughter: but does that automatically make her a Time Lord? I mean, is it genetic and automatic, or is it something some people on Gallifrey can choose to become, but others don't?
And I definitely don't know enough about Leela. I mean, I know she's basically prehistoric, but is she from prehistoric Gallifrey, then?
Sadly, I shan't be able to watch it tonight, as it clashes with a Christopher Lee programme I want to tape on another channel, and I can't tape one thing and watch another on my set-up. Since Doctor Who is repeated (the next night on BBC 3) and the Christopher Lee programme isn't, Mr. Lee has to win out, and I'll just have to wait.
no subject
Date: Saturday, 16 April 2005 17:39 (UTC)Ack - it is unwise to attempt serious analysis of a series that was written on an ad hoc basis!
no subject
Date: Saturday, 16 April 2005 19:25 (UTC)What??? You mean to say that dedicated Whovians might actually be woefully misguided after all?
Surely no-one would go so far!