1. The Reptile (1966), dir. John Gilling
Saturday, 22 February 2020 20:59![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
strange_complexThis is a Hammer film which I hadn't previously seen. It was shot back-to-back with Plague of the Zombies (which I have seen: LJ / DW), using lightly-amended versions of the same sets and some of the same cast, and indeed the stories are quite similar as well. Both basically involve horrors brought back from overseas which cause deaths in a Cornish village. In Plague, Squire Hamilton has brought zombie enslavement back quite deliberately from Haiti to help him exploit the labour of the locals and he doesn't care who suffers as a result. In Reptile, Dr Franklyn has brought back the snake sickness which possesses his daughter Anna from Borneo involuntarily, after a local cult imposed it on her to punish him for probing into their secrets. It is a matter of shame and torment which he is trying to conceal - though he too only really cares about the local deaths which result insofar as they might lead to Anna's secret being uncovered.
Both stories are thus about the consequences of empire and imperialism, and one character in Reptile even voices this in more or less perfect reverse colonisation terms when he says that their village was a good place until "they came, bringing their vileness with them." But they differ in detail and emphasis. While Hamilton is clearly an exploitative imperialist, and indeed personifies the British empire's ruling classes, the fact that he's equally exploitative of the Cornish villagers makes class rather than imperialism the central issue of Plague. Franklyn, by contrast, has exploited the empire for its intellectual rather than its economic potential. He is a Doctor of Divinity, rather than an aristocrat like Hamilton, who has travelled to India, Java, Borneo and Sumatra with Anna in pursuit of his research into 'the primitive religions of the east', but found in Borneo that a local Snake Cult did not appreciate his attentions - hence the curse on his daughter. This means he has no particularly malign intentions towards the locals back home himself (though he certainly considers himself aloof from and superior to them), which in turn allows the morality story about the consequences of empire to emerge more clearly in Reptile than in Plague. In Plague, Haiti is more a plot device which has allowed Hamilton's exploitation than anything (and of course Haiti was never a British colony anyway), and its role as a source of dangerous, exotic magic is wholly Othering. But in Reptile, the horrors experienced in Cornwall are quite explicitly the result of Borneans biting back, which is a rather more post-colonial perspective on the whole issue.
Looking a little more closely at the production details for the two, I'm going to hazard a guess that one reason for these differences is that they were written by different people, and that in the case of Reptile specifically, the writer was Anthony Hinds. I had cause to mention him recently in my review of Tom Holland's Supping with Panthers (LJ / DW), where I noted that he had insisted that Kali in the proposed Kali, Devil Bride of Dracula should be explicitly a fraud, rather than the real Hindu goddess, since the latter would be hugely offensive to Indian audiences. I think we might be seeing something of the same ability to understand the perspective of colonial peoples in Reptile. Certainly, it's noticeable that the main hero, Harry Spalding, has been in India, just as Hinds had in real life, while the one villager who is willing to help him try to solve their problems, Tom Bailey, has also seen the world as a seaman. This isn't to say Reptile is wholly progressive. We're still supposed to deplore what the snake cult did to Anna, while a Malay servant in Franklyn's house who is himself an adherent of the cult is portrayed as the greatest villain of the piece. As for the snake cult taking their vengeance on Franklyn through his daughter, of course, that is a very Hammerish device which occurs in several Dracula films (Risen, Taste, AD 1972, Satanic Rites), and is just the sort of thing you have to learn to look past if you otherwise love their films.
Overall, definitely provided a lot of food for thought, and has made me interested to look more into Anthony Hinds - both by watching the ten films he scripted which I haven't yet seen and by reading more about his role at Hammer and general biography.
Both stories are thus about the consequences of empire and imperialism, and one character in Reptile even voices this in more or less perfect reverse colonisation terms when he says that their village was a good place until "they came, bringing their vileness with them." But they differ in detail and emphasis. While Hamilton is clearly an exploitative imperialist, and indeed personifies the British empire's ruling classes, the fact that he's equally exploitative of the Cornish villagers makes class rather than imperialism the central issue of Plague. Franklyn, by contrast, has exploited the empire for its intellectual rather than its economic potential. He is a Doctor of Divinity, rather than an aristocrat like Hamilton, who has travelled to India, Java, Borneo and Sumatra with Anna in pursuit of his research into 'the primitive religions of the east', but found in Borneo that a local Snake Cult did not appreciate his attentions - hence the curse on his daughter. This means he has no particularly malign intentions towards the locals back home himself (though he certainly considers himself aloof from and superior to them), which in turn allows the morality story about the consequences of empire to emerge more clearly in Reptile than in Plague. In Plague, Haiti is more a plot device which has allowed Hamilton's exploitation than anything (and of course Haiti was never a British colony anyway), and its role as a source of dangerous, exotic magic is wholly Othering. But in Reptile, the horrors experienced in Cornwall are quite explicitly the result of Borneans biting back, which is a rather more post-colonial perspective on the whole issue.
Looking a little more closely at the production details for the two, I'm going to hazard a guess that one reason for these differences is that they were written by different people, and that in the case of Reptile specifically, the writer was Anthony Hinds. I had cause to mention him recently in my review of Tom Holland's Supping with Panthers (LJ / DW), where I noted that he had insisted that Kali in the proposed Kali, Devil Bride of Dracula should be explicitly a fraud, rather than the real Hindu goddess, since the latter would be hugely offensive to Indian audiences. I think we might be seeing something of the same ability to understand the perspective of colonial peoples in Reptile. Certainly, it's noticeable that the main hero, Harry Spalding, has been in India, just as Hinds had in real life, while the one villager who is willing to help him try to solve their problems, Tom Bailey, has also seen the world as a seaman. This isn't to say Reptile is wholly progressive. We're still supposed to deplore what the snake cult did to Anna, while a Malay servant in Franklyn's house who is himself an adherent of the cult is portrayed as the greatest villain of the piece. As for the snake cult taking their vengeance on Franklyn through his daughter, of course, that is a very Hammerish device which occurs in several Dracula films (Risen, Taste, AD 1972, Satanic Rites), and is just the sort of thing you have to learn to look past if you otherwise love their films.
Overall, definitely provided a lot of food for thought, and has made me interested to look more into Anthony Hinds - both by watching the ten films he scripted which I haven't yet seen and by reading more about his role at Hammer and general biography.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 23 February 2020 00:48 (UTC)However qualified by the rest of the script: nice.
no subject
Date: Sunday, 23 February 2020 03:01 (UTC)no subject
Date: Monday, 24 February 2020 23:42 (UTC)